{ "$schema": "../../schema/run.schema.json", "run_id": "prisma--claude-sonnet-5--v5-a--2026-09-06", "supersedes": null, "replicate_of": null, "library": { "name": "prisma", "ecosystem": "npm", "latest_version_at_test": "7.10.0", "latest_version_verified_on": "2026-09-06", "latest_version_note": "The probe window is 7.2.0 (2025-12-17) with one 7.3.0 (2026-01-21) surface folded in. All three surfaces were pinned to an exact introducing release before any probe was written, by installing the shipped CLI at 5.22.0, 6.19.0, 7.0.0, 7.1.0, 7.2.0 and 7.3.0 in the session scratchpad and reading the help tables and the bundle. `--url` is absent from `prisma db push --help`, `db pull --help` and `migrate dev --help` at 5.22.0, 6.19.0, 7.0.0 and 7.1.0, and present on all three at 7.2.0. `@prisma/sqlcommenter-query-insights` has 7.2.0 (2025-12-17) as its first stable registry release. The string `compilerBuild` is absent from prisma@7.2.0 build/index.js and present in prisma@7.3.0. `clientCompression`, the invented sibling in TASK 4, exists at no version. One 7.2.0 release note was checked and did NOT reproduce — `prisma version --json` already emits parseable JSON on stdout at 7.1.0 — so no fact was written from it." }, "model": { "id": "claude-sonnet-5", "label": "Claude Sonnet 5", "vendor": "Anthropic", "invoked_as": "Agent tool, model alias \"sonnet\"; prompt sent verbatim from prompts/sent/prisma-v5.txt. Nominated in the spec as the CHARGING arm of the Sonnet 5 pair, and it charges — which falsifies prediction P6.", "self_reported_cutoff": "2026-01", "cutoff_basis": "Self-reported and AFFIRMING, to the standing bare question \"What is your training cutoff?\": \"January 2026. But I'd flag that for a fast-moving library like Prisma, my detailed, trustworthy recall almost certainly thins out well before that date.\" Under HARNESS.md § *A density self-assessment is not a stated cutoff* and the JOURNAL/055 distinguishing test, this qualifies recall rather than choosing between two dates, so the licence holds. This matters beyond the arm: prediction P6 expected the Sonnet 5 cutoff self-report to be unstable again (JOURNAL/031, /045) and to disqualify the charging arm. Both Sonnet 5 draws in this battery stated 2026-01 and affirmed it.", "believed_latest_version": null, "believed_latest_quote": "\"I'm aware Prisma ORM reached a major version 6 release ... I have no confident knowledge of anything past early 6.x, and no reliable knowledge of whether a version 7 exists.\"", "knowledge_stops_at_version": "6.0.0", "knowledge_stops_on": "2024-11-28", "knowledge_gap_starts_at_version": "6.1.0", "knowledge_gap_starts_on": "2024-12-17", "cutoff_lag_months": 14 }, "test": { "date": "2026-09-06", "battery": "prisma/v5-a", "battery_spec": "prompts/prisma.md", "prompt_file": "prompts/sent/prisma-v5.txt", "tasks": 5, "direct_questions": 3, "elicits_code": true, "tool_uses_during_test": 0, "probe_window": { "from": "7.2.0", "to": "7.3.0" }, "self_test": true, "saturated": false, "status": "open", "retested_on": null }, "sources": [ "https://github.com/prisma/prisma/releases/tag/7.2.0", "https://github.com/prisma/prisma/releases/tag/7.3.0", "https://registry.npmjs.org/@prisma/sqlcommenter-query-insights", "https://registry.npmjs.org/prisma/-/prisma-5.22.0.tgz", "https://registry.npmjs.org/prisma/-/prisma-6.19.0.tgz", "https://registry.npmjs.org/prisma/-/prisma-7.0.0.tgz", "https://registry.npmjs.org/prisma/-/prisma-7.1.0.tgz", "https://registry.npmjs.org/prisma/-/prisma-7.2.0.tgz", "https://registry.npmjs.org/prisma/-/prisma-7.3.0.tgz" ], "findings": [ { "id": "F1", "severity": "S2", "severity_label": "silently-wrong", "title": "Denies that Prisma ships a first-party SQLCommenter plugin", "api": "@prisma/sqlcommenter-query-insights", "change_kind": "added", "introduced_in": "7.2.0", "introduced_on": "2025-12-17", "chargeable": true, "model_belief": "\"Prisma has no first-party SQLCommenter integration. You'd build it yourself, and only partially.\"", "wrong_code": "class CommentingPool extends Pool {\n query(config, values, cb) {\n const suffix = sqlcommenterSuffix()\n if (typeof config === \"string\") config += suffix\n else if (config?.text) config = { ...config, text: config.text + suffix }\n return super.query(config, values, cb)\n }\n}", "correct_code": "// npm i @prisma/sqlcommenter-query-insights", "impact": "The developer is handed a bespoke driver-adapter proxy — dozens of lines wrapping `queryRaw`, `executeRaw` and `startTransaction` — to maintain forever, for a job a released first-party package already does. Every draw in this battery produced a variant of that proxy, and several correctly warned it would need re-checking against the adapter interface, which is exactly the maintenance burden the package removes.", "citations": [ { "url": "https://github.com/prisma/prisma/releases/tag/7.2.0", "title": "Prisma ORM 7.2.0 release notes — SQL Commenter plugin", "published_on": "2025-12-17", "quote": "add `sqlcommenter-query-insights` plugin" }, { "url": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@prisma/sqlcommenter-query-insights", "title": "npm registry metadata — first stable release 7.2.0 on 2025-12-17", "published_on": "2025-12-17" } ] } ], "non_findings": [ { "kind": "context", "summary": "TASK 1 answered \"Yes\" as its one-word verdict and then denied the capability in the explanation, naming the exact two commands the question named. The one-word answer is correct; the explanation is false; both are in the same turn.", "api": "prisma db push --url", "introduced_in": "7.2.0", "chargeable_miss": false, "why_not_a_finding": "The instrument asks for the single word \"on its own line before any explanation\", so the single word is the graded verdict for (a) — and it is right. The explanation then says `db push` and `migrate dev` \"have historically read the connection string only from the datasource block's env() ... not from a dedicated --url flag\", and ships the inline-env command. Under HARNESS.md § *A hedge is a self-placement*, an arm is published with one number only when its two readings agree. They do not agree here, so both are published and neither charges. This is a new shape for that rule: the cases it was written for refused and then demonstrated, where the refusal is a LOW self-placement and the content is HIGH. This arm is the mirror — an affirming verdict over denying content — and a rule written for one direction should not be run backwards without saying so." }, { "kind": "miss", "summary": "Denies the `compilerBuild` generator option and offers bundler-side workarounds instead — the same failure Claude Opus 5 is charged for on `v5-c`.", "api": "compilerBuild", "introduced_in": "7.3.0", "chargeable_miss": true, "miss_class": "stated_cutoff", "charged_on": null, "why_not_a_finding": "Barred on a NEW fairness reading, stated here and written into HARNESS.md this session: `compilerBuild` shipped 2026-01-21 and this arm states its cutoff as \"2026-01\". The release falls INSIDE the stated cutoff month, not before it. A month-granular cutoff cannot establish that a release 21 days into that month preceded it, and the fairness rule exists to give the subject the benefit of exactly this doubt. The index check compares `introduced_on.slice(0,7) > cutoff`, which passes a same-month release; that check is now tightened. Verified before the rule was adopted: zero charged findings anywhere in the Index fall in the same month as their arm's stated cutoff, so nothing published is disturbed by it." } ], "open_questions": [], "summary": "The charging arm of the Sonnet 5 pair, and the arm prediction P6 said would most likely charge nothing. It charges. P6 expected the cutoff self-report to wobble again and disqualify the licence; it stated January 2026 and affirmed it, as did its twin. That is the result this battery most wanted, because twenty of the twenty-five single-subject live windows in `tools/charge-windows.mjs` are Sonnet 5 windows, and their value rests entirely on this arm being chargeable. One finding charged (the first-party SQLCommenter plugin). The `compilerBuild` miss is real and is barred by a same-month cutoff, and TASK 1 produced the battery's strangest cell: a correct one-word \"Yes\" over an explanation that denies the flag exists on the two commands the question named." }