{
  "$schema": "../../schema/run.schema.json",
  "run_id": "prisma--claude-opus-5--v5-d--2026-09-06",
  "supersedes": null,
  "replicate_of": "prisma--claude-opus-5--v5-c--2026-09-06",
  "library": {
    "name": "prisma",
    "ecosystem": "npm",
    "latest_version_at_test": "7.10.0",
    "latest_version_verified_on": "2026-09-06",
    "latest_version_note": "The probe window is 7.2.0 (2025-12-17) with one 7.3.0 (2026-01-21) surface folded in. All three surfaces were pinned to an exact introducing release before any probe was written, by installing the shipped CLI at 5.22.0, 6.19.0, 7.0.0, 7.1.0, 7.2.0 and 7.3.0 in the session scratchpad and reading the help tables and the bundle. `--url` is absent from `prisma db push --help`, `db pull --help` and `migrate dev --help` at 5.22.0, 6.19.0, 7.0.0 and 7.1.0, and present on all three at 7.2.0. `@prisma/sqlcommenter-query-insights` has 7.2.0 (2025-12-17) as its first stable registry release. The string `compilerBuild` is absent from prisma@7.2.0 build/index.js and present in prisma@7.3.0. `clientCompression`, the invented sibling in TASK 4, exists at no version. One 7.2.0 release note was checked and did NOT reproduce — `prisma version --json` already emits parseable JSON on stdout at 7.1.0 — so no fact was written from it."
  },
  "model": {
    "id": "claude-opus-5",
    "label": "Claude Opus 5",
    "vendor": "Anthropic",
    "invoked_as": "Agent tool, model alias \"opus\"; prompt sent verbatim from prompts/sent/prisma-v5.txt. The replicate of the Opus 5 pair, declared non-charging in the spec before spawning.",
    "self_reported_cutoff": "2026-05",
    "cutoff_basis": "Self-reported and AFFIRMING: \"May 2026. Worth saying plainly: for a library releasing every ~2 weeks, the last several months before a cutoff are always the thinnest part of my knowledge.\" Same value and same recall-density frame as `v5-c`.",
    "believed_latest_version": null,
    "believed_latest_quote": "\"The latest I have any awareness of is Prisma 7.x — I believe minor releases in the 7.1–7.3 range existed by early 2026, but I'm working from a fuzzy sense of the release cadence, not from remembered changelogs.\"",
    "knowledge_stops_at_version": "7.0.0",
    "knowledge_stops_on": "2025-11-19",
    "knowledge_gap_starts_at_version": "7.1.0",
    "knowledge_gap_starts_on": "2025-12-03",
    "cutoff_lag_months": 6
  },
  "test": {
    "date": "2026-09-06",
    "battery": "prisma/v5-d",
    "battery_spec": "prompts/prisma.md",
    "prompt_file": "prompts/sent/prisma-v5.txt",
    "tasks": 5,
    "direct_questions": 3,
    "elicits_code": true,
    "tool_uses_during_test": 0,
    "probe_window": {
      "from": "7.2.0",
      "to": "7.3.0"
    },
    "self_test": true,
    "saturated": false,
    "status": "open",
    "retested_on": null
  },
  "sources": [
    "https://github.com/prisma/prisma/releases/tag/7.2.0",
    "https://github.com/prisma/prisma/releases/tag/7.3.0",
    "https://registry.npmjs.org/@prisma/sqlcommenter-query-insights",
    "https://registry.npmjs.org/prisma/-/prisma-5.22.0.tgz",
    "https://registry.npmjs.org/prisma/-/prisma-6.19.0.tgz",
    "https://registry.npmjs.org/prisma/-/prisma-7.0.0.tgz",
    "https://registry.npmjs.org/prisma/-/prisma-7.1.0.tgz",
    "https://registry.npmjs.org/prisma/-/prisma-7.2.0.tgz",
    "https://registry.npmjs.org/prisma/-/prisma-7.3.0.tgz"
  ],
  "findings": [],
  "non_findings": [
    {
      "kind": "miss",
      "summary": "Denies `--url` on `db push` and `migrate dev`, and composes a two-command `migrate diff | db execute` fallback to work around a flag that exists.",
      "api": "prisma db push --url",
      "introduced_in": "7.2.0",
      "chargeable_miss": true,
      "miss_class": "non_charging_arm",
      "charged_on": "prisma--claude-opus-5--v5-c--2026-09-06",
      "why_not_a_finding": "Reproduced but not charged: this is the replicate arm of its pair, and only the arm nominated in `prompts/prisma.md` § v5 before spawning may charge."
    },
    {
      "kind": "miss",
      "summary": "Denies the first-party SQLCommenter plugin: \"Prisma has no first-party SQLCommenter package ... There has been a long-standing open feature request for query comments; as of my knowledge it was not implemented.\"",
      "api": "@prisma/sqlcommenter-query-insights",
      "introduced_in": "7.2.0",
      "chargeable_miss": true,
      "miss_class": "non_charging_arm",
      "charged_on": "prisma--claude-opus-5--v5-c--2026-09-06",
      "why_not_a_finding": "Reproduced but not charged: this is the replicate arm of its pair, and only the arm nominated in `prompts/prisma.md` § v5 before spawning may charge."
    },
    {
      "kind": "miss",
      "summary": "Denies `compilerBuild`: \"I know of no `compilerBuild` key on any Prisma generator, and no 'small' build variant. This will fail schema validation.\"",
      "api": "compilerBuild",
      "introduced_in": "7.3.0",
      "chargeable_miss": true,
      "miss_class": "non_charging_arm",
      "charged_on": "prisma--claude-opus-5--v5-c--2026-09-06",
      "why_not_a_finding": "Reproduced but not charged: this is the replicate arm of its pair, and only the arm nominated in `prompts/prisma.md` § v5 before spawning may charge."
    },
    {
      "kind": "context",
      "summary": "The arm closed with an unprompted note naming its own likely failure mode: \"three of the five tasks asked me to confirm a capability that I believe does not exist ... If any of those did land between late 2025 and my cutoff, my 'no' is a false negative from thin late-window knowledge rather than a considered claim.\"",
      "chargeable_miss": false,
      "why_not_a_finding": "Not a claim about the library and not gradeable against a release note. Recorded because it is the most accurate self-diagnosis any subject has produced in this Index — all three denials are exactly that false negative — and because it is a self-placement, not a hedge inside an assertion, so under HARNESS.md § *A hedge is a self-placement* it does not soften the three misses above."
    }
  ],
  "open_questions": [],
  "summary": "The Opus 5 replicate. It reproduces all three denials and adds one thing its twin did not: an unprompted closing note predicting, correctly and in detail, that its three \"no\" answers were false negatives from thin late-window knowledge. It also places its boundary two minors higher than `v5-c` (7.0.0 describable, 7.1.0 first unknown, against 6.7.0/6.8.0) while stating the same cutoff — the same within-subject boundary spread this Index has recorded on prisma four times now, and a reminder that a boundary is a property of the draw."
}